Asynchronous vs didactic education: it’s too early to throw in the towel on tradition
Open Access
- 8 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 13 (1), 105
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-105
Abstract
Asynchronous, computer based instruction is cost effective, allows self-directed pacing and review, and addresses preferences of millennial learners. Current research suggests there is no significant difference in learning compared to traditional classroom instruction. Data are limited for novice learners in emergency medicine. The objective of this study was to compare asynchronous, computer-based instruction with traditional didactics for senior medical students during a week-long intensive course in acute care. We hypothesized both modalities would be equivalent. This was a prospective observational quasi-experimental study of 4th year medical students who were novice learners with minimal prior exposure to curricular elements. We assessed baseline knowledge with an objective pre-test. The curriculum was delivered in either traditional lecture format (shock, acute abdomen, dyspnea, field trauma) or via asynchronous, computer-based modules (chest pain, EKG interpretation, pain management, trauma). An interactive review covering all topics was followed by a post-test. Knowledge retention was measured after 10 weeks. Pre and post-test items were written by a panel of medical educators and validated with a reference group of learners. Mean scores were analyzed using dependent t-test and attitudes were assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. 44 of 48 students completed the protocol. Students initially acquired more knowledge from didactic education as demonstrated by mean gain scores (didactic: 28.39% ± 18.06; asynchronous 9.93% ± 23.22). Mean difference between didactic and asynchronous = 18.45% with 95% CI [10.40 to 26.50]; p = 0.0001. Retention testing demonstrated similar knowledge attrition: mean gain scores -14.94% (didactic); -17.61% (asynchronous), which was not significantly different: 2.68% ± 20.85, 95% CI [-3.66 to 9.02], p = 0.399. The attitudinal survey revealed that 60.4% of students believed the asynchronous modules were educational and 95.8% enjoyed the flexibility of the method. 39.6% of students preferred asynchronous education for required didactics; 37.5% were neutral; 23% preferred traditional lectures. Asynchronous, computer-based instruction was not equivalent to traditional didactics for novice learners of acute care topics. Interactive, standard didactic education was valuable. Retention rates were similar between instructional methods. Students had mixed attitudes toward asynchronous learning but enjoyed the flexibility. We urge caution in trading in traditional didactic lectures in favor of asynchronous education for novice learners in acute care.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of an e-learning course in evidence-based medicine for foundation (internship) trainingJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2010
- Evaluation of a Web‐based Asynchronous Pediatric Emergency Medicine Learning Tool for Residents and Medical StudentsAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Alternatives to the Conference Status Quo: Summary Recommendations from the 2008 CORD Academic Assembly Conference Alternatives WorkgroupAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Procedures Can Be Learned on the Web: A Randomized Study of Ultrasound‐guided Vascular Access TrainingAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2008
- Internet-Based Learning in the Health ProfessionsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2008
- Evaluating Computer-Assisted Learning for Common Pediatric Emergency ProceduresPediatric Emergency Care, 2008
- Comparison of a web-based package with tutor-based methods of teaching respiratory medicine: subjective and objective evaluationsBMC Medical Education, 2007
- Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomised controlled trialBMC Medical Education, 2007
- The use of an asynchronous learning network for senior house officers in emergency medicineEmergency Medicine Journal, 2007
- Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online coursesDistance Education, 2001