COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries
Open Access
- 15 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature Medicine
- Vol. 27 (8), 1385-+
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01454-y
Abstract
Survey data collected across ten low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Africa and South America compared with surveys from Russia and the United States reveal heterogeneity in vaccine confidence in LMICs, with healthcare providers being trusted sources of information, as well as greater levels of vaccine acceptance in these countries than in Russia and the United States. Widespread acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial for achieving sufficient immunization coverage to end the global pandemic, yet few studies have investigated COVID-19 vaccination attitudes in lower-income countries, where large-scale vaccination is just beginning. We analyze COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across 15 survey samples covering 10 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Africa and South America, Russia (an upper-middle-income country) and the United States, including a total of 44,260 individuals. We find considerably higher willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine in our LMIC samples (mean 80.3%; median 78%; range 30.1 percentage points) compared with the United States (mean 64.6%) and Russia (mean 30.4%). Vaccine acceptance in LMICs is primarily explained by an interest in personal protection against COVID-19, while concern about side effects is the most common reason for hesitancy. Health workers are the most trusted sources of guidance about COVID-19 vaccines. Evidence from this sample of LMICs suggests that prioritizing vaccine distribution to the Global South should yield high returns in advancing global immunization coverage. Vaccination campaigns should focus on translating the high levels of stated acceptance into actual uptake. Messages highlighting vaccine efficacy and safety, delivered by healthcare workers, could be effective for addressing any remaining hesitancy in the analyzed LMICs.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviewsVaccine, 2015
- No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service deliveryJournal of Public Economics, 2014
- The Vaccination Confidence Scale: A brief measure of parents’ vaccination beliefsVaccine, 2014
- Inviting free-riders or appealing to prosocial behavior? Game-theoretical reflections on communicating herd immunity in vaccine advocacy.Health Psychology, 2013
- The CIA's vaccination ruseJournal of Public Health Policy, 2012
- Addressing the vaccine confidence gapThe Lancet, 2011
- Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analysisHealth Psychology Review, 2011
- Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentivesBMJ, 2010
- What Led to the Nigerian Boycott of the Polio Vaccination Campaign?PLoS Medicine, 2007
- Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination.Health Psychology, 2007