Carcinoma of the rectum: Treatment by anterior resection or abdominoperineal excision?
- 1 May 1973
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 16 (3), 206-210
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02600967
Abstract
Summary From 1,007 patients treated for carcinoma of the rectum from 1950 to 1964, 153 with carcinomas 11-15 cm from the anal verge were selected. There was no random selection, but 70 of the patients were treated by anterior resection, and 83 by abdomino-perineal excision. The two groups were reasonably comparable with reference to Dukes' classification, tumor size, age, and complicating diseases. There were slightly higher proportions of carcinomas invading local organs, colloid carcinomas, and anaplastic neoplasms in the abdominoperineal excision group. Postoperative mortality rates (7 and 8 per cent) and incidences of complications were much the same in the two groups. The corrected five- and ten-year survival rates, respectively, were 78.8 and 57.4 per cent in the anterior resection group and 65 and 46.6 per cent in the abdomino-perineal excision group. We conclude that it is justifiable to perform anterior resection in treatment of patients with carcinomas of the rectum of Dukes' types B and C when the carcinomas are more than 10 cm from the anal verge.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anterior versus abdominoperineal resection: Resection for rectal and rectosigmoid carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgery, 1968
- Treatment of cancer of the rectumThe American Journal of Surgery, 1968
- Carcinoma of Rectum and Low SigmoidArchives of Surgery, 1965
- Pelvic Recurrence after Excision of Rectum for CarcinomaBMJ, 1963
- Adenocarcinoma of the RectumA.M.A. Archives of Surgery, 1960
- The classification of cancer of the rectumThe Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1932