The need for Pragmatic Experimentation in Educational Research
- 28 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Economics of Innovation and New Technology
- Vol. 16 (5), 323-330
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590600982327
Abstract
The randomised controlled trial (RCT) is the best method for evaluating changes in educational practice. Nevertheless, it has been criticised because its results often have poor ecological validity. This valid criticism can be addressed by designing the RCT so that it mimics normal teaching practice as closely as possible, while retaining the benefits of random allocation. In this article, we discuss the issues of designing a pragmatic RCT. We also present an example of such a trial in computer-assisted learning in literacy.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is an intervention using computer software effective in literacy learning? A randomised controlled trialEducational Studies, 2006
- A comparison of randomised controlled trials in health and educationBritish Educational Research Journal, 2005
- Practical Clinical TrialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2003
- Effects of Instruction on Deriving Word Meaning from Context and Incidental Word LearningL1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2002
- The Need for Randomised Controlled Trials in Educational ResearchBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 2001
- The teachability of children with naive theories: An exploration of the effects of two teaching methodsBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999
- Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1967
- The scientific study of the teaching of spelling.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1911