Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 31 March 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in European Urology
- Vol. 77 (4), 403-417
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.049
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Scholarship
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia's Research Program
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metastasis-directed Therapy of Regional and Distant Recurrences After Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureEuropean Urology, 2015
- Evaluation of Hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2015
- Prostate‐specific membrane antigen‐based imaging in prostate cancer: Impact on clinical decision making processThe Prostate, 2015
- Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial dataArchives of Public Health, 2014
- Meta-analysis of prevalenceJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2013
- Utility of Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Lymph Node Involvement Identification in Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysisEuropean Urology, 2013
- PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesionsEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2012
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysisClinical Radiology, 2008
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003