Nonutility of routine testing of stool for ova and parasites in a tertiary care Canadian centre
- 1 May 2012
- journal article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Microbiology
- Vol. 58 (5), 653-659
- https://doi.org/10.1139/w2012-039
Abstract
Background In many clinical situations, stool examinations for ova and parasites (O&P) are routine in the work-up of patients with acute or chronic diarrhea. Frequently, these tests are found to be negative for pathogens. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic yield of routine stool testing for O&P in a Canadian tertiary care centre and to estimate the potential clinical benefit of a positive result. Patients and Methods All stool samples sent to the central microbiology laboratory at London Health Sciences Centre were reviewed over a 5-year period ending January 2010. Initial screening was done by direct antigen testing using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technique followed by direct microscopy for negative results where there was a high index of suspicion and for positive results to rule out any concurrent parasites not included in the EIA kit. Pathogens identified were categorized and their potential susceptibility to metronidazole was estimated. No clinical data were available, as this was purely a utilization study. Results A total of 5812 stool tests were ordered. Of these, 5681 (97.7%) were completed. The most common reasons for an incomplete test were sample leakage (n = 38) and use of the incorrect collection kit (n = 32). Direct microscopy identified white blood cells in 17% of patients with positive testing. The most common pathogen was Giardia lamblia , which was detected in 45/83 (54%) of positive specimens. Entamoeba histolytica / Entamoeba dispar was identified in 16/83 (19%) and Cryptosporidium spp. in 10/83 (12%) of positive specimens. Microorganisms not thought to be pathogenic were identified in 7/83 (8%). Direct laboratory costs independent of labor were estimated at $1836 per clinically significant organism identified. Of the 77 specimens positive for pathogenic organisms, 62 (81%) were likely to be sensitive to treatment with metronidazole. Conclusion In a tertiary care centre, the diagnostic yield of routine testing of stool for O&P during the evaluation of patients with acute or chronic diarrhea is low. Most clinically significant positive results should be responsive to metronidazole, but empirical treatment is not encouraged. Strategies to identify patients with a higher likelihood of harboring pathogenic parasites and consideration of empiric metronidazole therapy for patients at highest risk merit further research.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physician Use of Parasite Tests in the United States from 1997 to 2006 and in a Utah Cryptosporidium Outbreak in 2007Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011
- Intestinal Infections in Humans in the Rocky Mountain Region, United StatesJournal of Parasitology, 2010
- Parasitological diagnosis combining an internally controlled real-time PCR assay for the detection of four protozoa in stool samples with a testing algorithm for microscopyClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2009
- Detection of Pathogenic Protozoa in the Diagnostic Laboratory: Result Reproducibility, Specimen Pooling, and Competency AssessmentJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Point Prevalence ofCryptosporidium, Cyclospora,andIsosporaInfections in Patients Being Evaluated for DiarrheaAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2004
- Practice Guidelines for the Management of Infectious DiarrheaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Evaluation of the Triage Micro Parasite Panel for Detection of Giardia lamblia , Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar , and Cryptosporidium parvum in Patient Stool SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Diagnosis of enteric pathogens in children with gastroenteritisPathology, 2001
- Yield From Stool Testing of Pediatric InpatientsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1997
- Practice Guidelines for Ordering Stool Ova and Parasite Testing in a Pediatric PopulationAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995