Assessing the effectiveness of empiric antimicrobial regimens in cases of septic/infected abortions
- 1 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 38 (6), 1123-1128
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158389
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility TestsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2018
- Treating Spontaneous and Induced Septic AbortionsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2015
- Quantifying the global burden of morbidity due to unsafe abortion: Magnitude in hospital‐based studies and methodological issuesInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2012
- Are antibiotics necessary after 48 hours of improvement in infected/septic abortions? A randomized controlled trial followed by a cohort studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- Risk Factors for Legal Induced Abortion–Related Mortality in the United StatesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- The clinical course of patients with septic abortion admitted to an intensive care unitIntensive Care Medicine, 2004
- Septic AbortionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Double-Blind Comparison of Clindamycin with Penicillin plus Chloramphenicol in Treatment of Septic AbortionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1977
- Nonclostridial anaerobic bacteria in septic abortionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1969
- Placental bacteremia: A significant finding in septic abortion accompanied by vascular collapseAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1956