Prospective observational single-centre cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of treating lupus nephritis with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil but no oral steroids
Open Access
- 5 June 2013
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 72 (8), 1280-1286
- https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202844
Abstract
Objectives Lupus nephritis (LN) is a serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). All current treatment regimens include oral steroids, which are associated with severe adverse events and long-term damage. We have piloted a steroid-avoiding protocol (rituxilup) for the treatment of biopsy-proven active International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) class III, IV, or class V LN. Methods We report the findings from the first 50 consecutive patients, treated with 2 doses of rituximab (1 g) and methyl prednisolone (500 mg) on days 1 and 15, and maintenance treatment of mycophenolate mofetil. Patients on maintenance steroids or with life-threatening SLE or requiring dialysis were excluded. Renal remission was defined as serum creatinine no greater than 15% above baseline; complete biochemical remission (CR) was defined as urine protein : creatinine ratio (PCR)50 mg/mmol but non-nephrotic and >50% reduction. Results A total of 45 (90%) patients achieved CR or PR by a median time of 37 weeks (range 4–200). Overall, 72% (n=36) achieved CR (median time 36 weeks (11–58)) and a further 18% (n=9) achieved persistent PR (median time 32 weeks (19–58)). By 52 weeks, CR and PR had been achieved in 52% (n=26) and 34% (n=17) respectively. In all, 12 relapses occurred in 11 patients, at a median time of 65.1 weeks (20–112) from remission. A total of 6/50 patients had systemic flares. Of the 45 responders, only 2 required >2 weeks of oral steroids. Adverse events were infrequent; 18% were admitted, 10% for an infective episode. Conclusions The rituxilup cohort demonstrates that oral steroids can be safely avoided in the treatment of LN. If findings are confirmed, it could mark a step change in the approach to the treatment of LN.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mycophenolate versus Azathioprine as Maintenance Therapy for Lupus NephritisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis TrialAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2010
- Lupus nephritis: where are we now?Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 2010
- Practice pattern variation in oral glucocorticoid therapy after the induction of response in proliferative lupus nephritisLupus, 2010
- Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Cyclophosphamide for Induction Treatment of Lupus NephritisJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Beyond immunosuppression – challenges in the clinical management of lupus nephritisLupus, 2009
- The prevalence and incidence of biopsy‐proven lupus nephritis in the UK: Evidence of an ethnic gradientArthritis & Rheumatism, 2006
- Mycophenolate Mofetil or Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Lupus NephritisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Steroid Sparing in Renal Transplantation With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil: Three-Year ResultsTransplantation Proceedings, 2005
- Damage in systemic lupus erythematosus and its association with corticosteroidsArthritis & Rheumatism, 2000