Occasional‐operator percutaneous brachial coronary angiography: First, do no arm
- 30 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 57 (2), 161-165
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10329
Abstract
The percutaneous brachial approach to coronary angiography is perceived, rightly or wrongly, to be the easiest of the arm approaches. Predominantly femoral operators may therefore be encouraged to use the percutaneous brachial approach as an occasional procedure. We decided to investigate prospectively whether this was a reasonable strategy by examining outcome in patients who underwent percutaneous brachial cardiac catheterization by occasional brachial operators. Between October 1997 and 2000, 55 patients underwent percutaneous brachial coronary angiography (0.6% of coronary angiographies), aged 66 ± 10 years, of whom 40 (73%) were male. Chief indications for a brachial approach were peripheral vascular disease in 35 (64%), failed femoral approach in 10 (18%), and orthopnoea in 5 (9%). The procedure was completed successfully in 46 patients (84%). Reasons for failure were failure of access (two), brachial artery spasm (one), inability to negotiate brachial/subclavian tortuosity (two), dissection of the brachial artery (two), and inability to intubate a vein graft (two). Six patients required catheterization from an alternative site (brachial arteriotomy in two, percutaneous transradial in two, femoral in two), with success in all. There were complications of varying severity in 20 patients (36%). Major complications were false aneurysm requiring surgical repair (one), large brachial hematoma requiring surgical exploration and arterial repair (one), and hematoma with clinical median nerve dysfunction for one month. Minor complications included need for repeat coronary angiography via alternative approach (six), weakness of radial pulse < 24 hr (two), brachial artery dissection without clinical sequelae (two), brachial artery spasm terminating procedure (one), and wound oozing (three). Percutaneous brachial coronary angiography is a hazardous procedure when undertaken by occasional brachial operators. Complications are unacceptably frequent. As with all practical procedures, complication rates are likely to be inversely proportional to operator volumes. Patients requiring an arm approach should be referred to operators with high-volume brachial or radial experience. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:161–165.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coronary angiography from the radial artery – experience, complications and limitationsInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1998
- Median nerve injury: an underrecognised complication of brachial artery cardiac catheterisation?Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1997
- Transbrachial arteriography: Indications and complicationsClinical Radiology, 1996
- Complications of direct brachial artery puncture for arteriography: A comparison of techniquesClinical Radiology, 1991
- Percutaneous right brachial artery approach with 5f catheters for studying coronary artery diseaseCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1991
- Clinical experience with percutaneous brachial coronary angiography in a “Judkins” laboratoryCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1990
- Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiographyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1989
- Percutaneous brachial approach using the femoral artery sheath for left heart catheterization and selective coronary angiographyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1985
- Percutaneous brachial catheterization using a modified sheath and new catheter systemCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1984
- Percutaneous entry of the brachial artery for left heart catheterization using a sheathCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1981