Disaster Exercises to Prepare Hospitals for Mass-Casualty Incidents: Does it Contribute to Preparedness or is it Ritualism?
- 17 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
- Vol. 33 (4), 387-393
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x18000584
Abstract
IntroductionThe central question this study sought to answer was whether the team members of Strategic Crisis Teams (SCTs) participating in mass-casualty incident (MCI) exercises in the Netherlands learn from their participation.MethodsEvaluation reports of exercises that took place at two different times were collected and analyzed against a theoretical model with several dimensions, looking at both the quality of the evaluation methodology (three criteria: objectives described, link between objective and items for improvement, and data-collection method) and the learning effect of the exercise (one criterion: the change in number of items for improvement).ResultsOf all 32 evaluation reports, 81% described exercise objectives; 30% of the items for improvement in the reports were linked to these objectives, and 22% of the 32 evaluation reports used a structured template to describe the items for improvement. In six evaluation categories, the number of items for improvement increased between the first (T1) and the last (T2) evaluation report submitted by hospitals. The number of items remained equal for two evaluation categories and decreased in six evaluation categories.ConclusionThe evaluation reports do not support the ideal-typical disaster exercise process. The authors could not establish that team members participating in MCI exercises in the Netherlands learn from their participation. More time and effort must be spent on the development of a validated evaluation system for these simulations, and more research into the role of the evaluator is needed.Verheul MLMI, Dückers MLA, Visser BB, Beerens RJJ, Bierens JJLM. Disaster exercises to prepare hospitals for mass-casualty incidents: does it contribute to preparedness or is it ritualism? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(4):387–393Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcareBMJ Quality & Safety, 2013
- A Consensus Process on the Use of Exercises and After Action Reports to Assess and Improve Public Health Emergency Preparedness and ResponsePrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2013
- Use of After Action Reports (AARs) to Promote Organizational and Systems Learning in Emergency PreparednessInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2012
- Understanding organisational development, sustainability, and diffusion of innovations within hospitals participating in a multilevel quality collaborativeImplementation Science, 2011
- What-You-Look-For-Is-What-You-Find – The consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manualsSafety Science, 2009
- Disasters, Lessons Learned, and Fantasy DocumentsJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2009
- What Is Learning Anyway? A Topographical Perspective ConsideredEducational Psychologist, 2009
- Effectiveness of Hospital Staff Mass-Casualty Incident Training Methods: A Systematic Literature ReviewPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2004
- Individual and Group Learning in Crisis SimulationsJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2002
- Learning Processes for Crisis Management in Complex OrganizationsJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1997