Usefulness of a New Three-Dimensional Simulator System for Radiofrequency Ablation
Open Access
- 4 February 2016
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 11 (2), e0148298
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148298
Abstract
Multipuncture radiofrequency ablation is expected to produce a large ablated area and reduce intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma; however, it requires considerable skill. This study evaluated the utility of a new simulator system for multipuncture radiofrequency ablation. To understand positioning of multipuncture electrodes on three-dimensional images, we developed a new technology by expanding real-time virtual ultrasonography. We performed 21 experimental punctures in phantoms. Electrode insertion directions and positions were confirmed on computed tomography, and accuracy and utility of the simulator system were evaluated by measuring angles and intersections for each electrode. Moreover, to appropriately assess placement of the three electrodes, puncture procedures with or without the simulator were performed by experts and non-experts. Technical success was defined as maximum angle and distance ratio, as calculated by maximum and minimum distances between electrodes. In punctures using 2 electrodes, correlations between angles on each imaging modality were strong (ultrasound vs. simulator: r = 0.991, p<0.001, simulator vs. computed tomography: r = 0.991, p<0.001, ultrasound vs. computed tomography: r = 0.999, p<0.001). Correlations between distances in each imaging modality were also strong (ultrasound vs. simulator: r = 0.993, p<0.001; simulator vs. computed tomography: r = 0.994, p<0.001; ultrasound vs. computed tomography: r = 0.994, p<0.001). In cases with 3 electrodes, distances between each electrode correlated strongly (yellow-labeled vs. red-labeled: r = 0.980, p<0.001; red-labeled vs. blue-labeled: r = 0.953, p<0.001; yellow-labeled vs. blue-labeled: r = 0.953, p<0.001). Both angle and distance ratio (expert with simulator vs. without simulator; p = 0.03, p = 0.02) were significantly smaller in procedures performed by experts using the simulator system. The new simulator system appears to accurately guide electrode positioning. This simulator system could allow multipuncture radiofrequency ablation to be performed more effectively and comfortably.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Small- and Medium-sized Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation with a Multiple-Electrode Switching System—Mid-term ResultsRadiology, 2013
- Clinical effectiveness of bipolar radiofrequency ablation for small liver cancersThe Esophagus, 2012
- Virtual Puncture Line in Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of the Caudate LobeAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2009
- Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Correlation Between Local Tumor Progression After Ablation and Ablative MarginAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2007
- Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation with Internally Cooled Electrodes: Experimental Study in ex Vivo Bovine Liver with Mathematic ModelingRadiology, 2006
- Multipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: Initial ExperienceRadiology, 2005
- Does Percutaneous Liver Biopsy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cause Hematogenous Dissemination? An In Vivo Study with Quantitative Assay of Circulating Tumor DNA Using Methylation-Specific Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- Radiofrequency Thermal AblationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Needle-tract implantation from hepatocellular cancer: Is needle biopsy of the liver always necessary?Liver Transplantation, 2000
- Surgical Margin in Hepatic Resection for Colorectal MetastasisAnnals of Surgery, 1998