Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study
- 24 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 120 (1), 85-91
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12010
Abstract
Objective To estimate the incidence of multiple repeat caesarean section (MRCS) (five or more) in the UK and to describe the outcomes for women and their babies relative to women having fewer repeat caesarean sections. Design A national population-based prospective cohort study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). Setting All UK hospitals with consultant-led maternity units. Population Ninety-four women having their fifth or greater MRCS between January 2009 and December 2009, and 175 comparison women having their second to fourth caesarean section. Methods Prospective cohort and comparison identification through the UKOSS monthly mailing system. Main outcome measures Incidence, maternal and neonatal complications. Relative risk, unadjusted (OR) and adjusted (aOR) odds ratio estimates. Results The estimated UK incidence of MRCS was 1.20 per 10 000 maternities [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97–1.47]. Women with MRCS had significantly more major obstetric haemorrhages (>1500 ml) (aOR, 18.6; 95% CI, 3.89–88.8), visceral damage (aOR, 17.6; 95% CI, 1.85–167.1) and critical care admissions (aOR, 15.5; 95% CI, 3.16–76.0), than women with lower order repeat caesarean sections. These risks were greatest in the 18% of women with MRCS who also had placenta praevia or accreta. Neonates of mothers having MRCS were significantly more likely to be born prior to 37 weeks of gestation (OR, 6.15; 95% CI, 2.56–15.78) and therefore had higher rates of complications and admissions. Conclusions MRCS is associated with greater maternal and neonatal morbidity than fewer caesarean sections. The associated maternal morbidity is largely secondary to placenta praevia and accreta, whereas higher rates of preterm delivery are most likely a response to antepartum haemorrhage.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peripartum hysterectomy in the UK: management and outcomes of the associated haemorrhageBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta AccretaObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Maternal Morbidity Associated With Multiple Repeat Cesarean DeliveriesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- The UK Obstetric Surveillance System for raredisorders of pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean DeliveryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Higher order repeat caesarean sections: how safe are five or more?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- Outcome after a high number (4–10) of repeated caesarean sectionsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- Higher Order Multiple Repeat Cesarean Sections: Maternal and Fetal OutcomeAnnals of Saudi Medicine, 2003
- Pregnancy outcome of patients with previous four or more caesarean sectionsJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- Multiple caesarean sections: outcomes and complicationsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988