Analysing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Government and Opposition
- Vol. 44 (2), 125-145
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x
Abstract
This article makes a case for rethinking traditional approaches to the study of legislative behaviour on behalf of women by asking (1) not when women make a difference, but how the substantive representation of women occurs; and (2) not what ‘women’ do, but what specific actors do. The first shift aims to explore the contexts, identities and attitudes that motivate and inform substantive representation. The second seeks to move beyond a focus on female legislators to identify the ‘critical actors’, male and female, who may attempt to represent women as a group. In so doing, this framework calls attention to how structure and agency interact in the substantive representation of women.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of WomenCanadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 2007
- Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women's Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979)Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 2006
- The Story of the Theory of Critical MassPolitics & Gender, 2006
- Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State LegislaturesPolitics & Gender, 2005
- When Tokens MatterLegislative Studies Quarterly, 2004
- Westminster Women: The Politics of PresencePolitical Studies, 2003
- Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour's Women MPsBritish Journal of Political Science, 2003
- Female EmpowermentWomen & Politics, 1998
- RETHINKING TOKENISM:Gender & Society, 1991
- Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token WomenAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977