Harvest-induced disruptive selection increases variance in fitness-related traits
- 9 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings. Biological sciences
- Vol. 276 (1676), 4163-4171
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1106
Abstract
The form of Darwinian selection has important ecological and management implications. Negative effects of harvesting are often ascribed to size truncation (i.e. strictly directional selection against large individuals) and resultant decrease in trait variability, which depresses capacity to buffer environmental change, hinders evolutionary rebound and ultimately impairs population recovery. However, the exact form of harvest-induced selection is generally unknown and the effects of harvest on trait variability remain unexplored. Here we use unique data from the Windermere (UK) long-term ecological experiment to show in a top predator (pike, Esox lucius) that the fishery does not induce size truncation but disruptive (diversifying) selection, and does not decrease but rather increases variability in pike somatic growth rate and size at age. This result is supported by complementary modelling approaches removing the effects of catch selectivity, selection prior to the catch and environmental variation. Therefore, fishing most likely increased genetic variability for somatic growth in pike and presumably favoured an observed rapid evolutionary rebound after fishery relaxation. Inference about the mechanisms through which harvesting negatively affects population numbers and recovery should systematically be based on a measure of the exact form of selection. From a management perspective, disruptive harvesting necessitates combining a preservation of large individuals with moderate exploitation rates, and thus provides a comprehensive tool for sustainable exploitation of natural resources.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reversal of evolutionary downsizing caused by selective harvest of large fishProceedings. Biological sciences, 2009
- Evolutionary rebound from selective harvestingTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008
- Nets versus natureNature, 2007
- Trait changes in a harvested population are driven by a dynamic tug-of-war between natural and harvest selectionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Four decades of opposing natural and human‐induced artificial selection acting on Windermere pike (Esox lucius)Ecology Letters, 2007
- Fisheries Sustainability via Protection of Age Structure and Spatial Distribution of Fish PopulationsFisheries, 2004
- Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy huntingNature, 2003
- Sustaining Fisheries Yields Over Evolutionary Time ScalesScience, 2002
- A Study of Reproduction, Early Life, Weight-Length Relationship and Growth of Pike, Esox lucius L., in WindermereJournal of Animal Ecology, 1967
- The Determination of the Age and Growth of Pike (Esox lucius L.) from Scales and Opercular BonesICES Journal of Marine Science, 1959