Comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models for cell growth, gene expression and drug resistance
- 14 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Materials Science and Engineering: C
- Vol. 107, 110264
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110264
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Programa Nacional de Apoio à Atenção Oncológica (SIPAR 250000.159946/2014-16)
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Established and Emerging Biomarkers in Cutaneous Malignant MelanomaHealthcare, 2014
- Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D MatrigelProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Discovering the False Discovery RateJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2010
- Biocompatibility, osteointegration, osteoconduction, and biodegradation of a hydroxyapatite-polyhydroxybutyrate compositeBrazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 2010
- Matrigel: A complex protein mixture required for optimal growth of cell cultureProteomics, 2010
- PHB/PHBHHx scaffolds and human adipose-derived stem cells for cartilage tissue engineeringBiomaterials, 2009
- Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell cultureBiotechnology & Bioengineering, 2009
- The morphologies of breast cancer cell lines in three‐dimensional assays correlate with their profiles of gene expressionMolecular Oncology, 2007
- Designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds for 3D tissue cell culturesSeminars in Cancer Biology, 2005
- Preparation and characterization of poly(l-lactic acid) foamsPolymer, 1994