Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication
Top Cited Papers
- 28 August 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 26 (1), 41-60
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3865-7
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an increasingly popular tool to optimize care and bridge the gap between patient experience and clinician understanding. The aim of this review was to identify mechanisms through which PROs facilitate patient-clinician communication in the adult oncology population. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature using the following data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cab Direct, and CDSR. Studies included in this review reported on the outcomes of PRO use, used PROs as an intervention and not as a study outcome measurement tool, included cancer patients or survivors as study participants, and analyzed patient-clinician communication. We identified 610 unique records, of which 43 publications met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Synthesis of the reviewed studies provided evidence of the usefulness of PROs in facilitating patient-clinician communication on a variety of topics. We identified mechanisms though which PROs influenced patient-clinician communication to include increasing symptom awareness, prompting discussion, streamlining consultations, and facilitating inter-professional communication. Barriers to PRO use in communication improvement include technical problems impeding its administration and completion, compliance issues due to lack of incentive or forgetfulness, and use of PROs that do not appropriately assess issues relevant to the patient. Facilitators include increased education on PRO use, using PRO tools that patients find more acceptable, and providing patient data summaries in an easily accessible format for clinicians. Our review suggests that PROs facilitate patient-clinician communication through various mechanisms that could perhaps contribute to improvements in symptom management and survival. The impact of PROs on clinical outcomes, however, remains poorly studied.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic settingBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation researchImplementation Science, 2012
- The usefulness and feasibility of a screening instrument to identify psychosocial problems in patients receiving curative radiotherapy: a process evaluationBMC Cancer, 2011
- Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Enhancing Patient-Provider Communication With the Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer: A Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Multidisciplinary Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of the Use and Utility of a Symptom Assessment System for Oncology PatientsJournal of Oncology Practice, 2011
- Routine psychosocial distress screening in radiotherapy: implementation and evaluation of a computerised procedureBritish Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Patients report improvements in continuity of care when quality of life assessments are used routinely in oncology practice: Secondary outcomes of a randomised controlled trialEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Screening for psychological distress in patients with lung cancer: results of a clinical audit evaluating the use of the patient Distress ThermometerSupportive Care in Cancer, 2010