Defining the True Sensitivity of Culture for the Diagnosis of Melioidosis Using Bayesian Latent Class Models
Open Access
- 30 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (8), e12485
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012485
Abstract
Culture remains the diagnostic gold standard for many bacterial infections, and the method against which other tests are often evaluated. Specificity of culture is 100% if the pathogenic organism is not found in healthy subjects, but the sensitivity of culture is more difficult to determine and may be low. Here, we apply Bayesian latent class models (LCMs) to data from patients with a single Gram-negative bacterial infection and define the true sensitivity of culture together with the impact of misclassification by culture on the reported accuracy of alternative diagnostic tests. Data from published studies describing the application of five diagnostic tests (culture and four serological tests) to a patient cohort with suspected melioidosis were re-analysed using several Bayesian LCMs. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs) were calculated. Of 320 patients with suspected melioidosis, 119 (37%) had culture confirmed melioidosis. Using the final model (Bayesian LCM with conditional dependence between serological tests), the sensitivity of culture was estimated to be 60.2%. Prediction accuracy of the final model was assessed using a classification tool to grade patients according to the likelihood of melioidosis, which indicated that an estimated disease prevalence of 61.6% was credible. Estimates of sensitivities, specificities, PPVs and NPVs of four serological tests were significantly different from previously published values in which culture was used as the gold standard. Culture has low sensitivity and low NPV for the diagnosis of melioidosis and is an imperfect gold standard against which to evaluate alternative tests. Models should be used to support the evaluation of diagnostic tests with an imperfect gold standard. It is likely that the poor sensitivity/specificity of culture is not specific for melioidosis, but rather a generic problem for many bacterial and fungal infections.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increasing Incidence of Human Melioidosis in Northeast ThailandThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2010
- Studying bacterial infections through culture-independent approachesJournal of Medical Microbiology, 2009
- A Burkholderia pseudomallei protein microarray reveals serodiagnostic and cross-reactive antigensProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: A case studyStatistics in Medicine, 2008
- Accuracy of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Using Crude and Purified Antigens for Serodiagnosis of MelioidosisClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2007
- Melioidosis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and ManagementClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2005
- Evaluation of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG Rapid Cassette Test Kits for Diagnosis of Melioidosis in an Area of EndemicityJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and FitJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- Diagnosis of fungal infection: new technologies for the mycology laboratoryTransplant Infectious Disease, 2002
- A Model for Evaluating Sensitivity and Specificity for Correlated Diagnostic Tests in Efficacy Studies with an Imperfect Reference TestJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1998