Engineering the Global University Rankings: Gold Standards, Limitations and Implications

Abstract

Global University ranking tables influence students and public opinion perceptions, and the overall reputations of universities among an international audience. In this article, the credibility of such ranking tables is questioned based on the tendency of ranking systems to promote questionable universities, documented instances of ethical misconduct, and inconsistencies between different ranking tables. The findings are validated using the ARWU (or Shanghai ranking), the QS University ranking and the THE World University ranking, which are considered the gold standards today among Global University ranking tables. Inconsistencies between ranking tables with respect to parameters used in analysis and validation are pointed out. Furthermore, it is shown that all three ranking tables can be gamed by universities to get a high ranking using parameters that do not capture the wide spectrum of characteristics that reflect academic excellence in research, teaching and services.