The battering of informed consent
Open Access
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 30 (6), 565-569
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.002949
Abstract
Autonomy has been hailed as the foremost principle of bioethics, and yet patients’ decisions and research subjects’ voluntary participation are being subjected to frequent restrictions. It has been argued that patient care is best served by a limited form of paternalism because the doctor is better qualified to take critical decisions than the patient, who is distracted by illness. The revival of paternalism is unwarranted on two grounds: firstly, because prejudging that the sick are not fully autonomous is a biased and unsubstantial view; secondly, because the technical knowledge of healthcare professionals does not include the ethical qualifications and prerogative to decide for others. Clinical research settings are even more prone to erode subjects’ autonomy than clinical settings because of the tendency and temptation to resort to such practices as shading the truth when consent to participation is sought, or waiving consent altogether when research is done in emergency settings. Instead of supporting such dubious practices with unconvincing arguments, it would seem to be the task of bioethics to insist on reinforcing autonomy.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmaceutical Research Involving the HomelessJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2002
- Conflicting Interests, Social Justice and Proxy Consent to ResearchJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2002
- Good Enough for the Third WorldJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2000
- Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs?Journal of Medical Ethics, 1997
- Existential autonomy: why patients should make their own choices.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1997
- MODIFIED INFORMED CONSENT IN A VIRAL SEROPREVALENCE STUDY IN THE CARIBBEANBioethics, 1996
- Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1995
- PATERNALISM AND THE ARGUMENT FROM ILLITERACYBioethics, 1995
- Informed consent and moral integrity.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1989
- Paternalism modernised.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1985