Blunt Needles for the Reduction of Needlestick Injuries During Cesarean Delivery
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 114 (2), 211-216
- https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181ae9b4a
Abstract
To compare the rate of glove perforation as a proxy for needlestick injuries between blunt and sharp needles used during cesarean-delivery closure and to survey physician satisfaction with blunt needles. Patients requiring cesarean delivery were assigned randomly to receive closure with either blunt (study group) or sharp needles (control group). Patient demographics, operator experience, and other clinical variables were collected. Physicians reported any percutaneous injuries and were surveyed regarding satisfaction with the assigned needles. Glove perforation was determined using a validated water-test method. Differences between patient groups were tested using chi and Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Student t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. There were 194 patients enrolled in the trial: 97 in the control group and 97 in the study group. There were no statistical differences between groups in patient demographics. There were no differences between groups in clinical variables, type of cesarean delivery, or experience level of the surgeon. There was a significant reduction in total glove perforation rate for the primary surgeon with blunt needles (7.2%) compared with sharp needles (17.5%) (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.89) as well as for the assistant surgeon (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.71). There was poor correlation between reported perforations and those detected by water test (R=0.3). Physicians reported that they were not as satisfied with blunt needles compared with sharp needles (P=.001). There was a significant decrease in the rate of glove perforation for surgeons and assistants performing cesarean-delivery closure with blunt needles. Assistant surgeons had the greatest reduction in glove perforations. However, physicians reported decreased satisfaction performing the surgery with blunt needles. ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00844636 I.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: 2006Pediatrics, 2008
- Preventing Needlestick Injuries in Obstetrics and GynecologyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Blunt Tapered and Standard Needles in Closing Abdominal FasciaWorld Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Preventing sharps injuries in the operating room1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2004
- A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategiesJournal of Hospital Infection, 2003
- The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and ElaborationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupationsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000
- Influence of blunt needles on surgical glove perforation and safety for the surgeonThe American Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Randomized trial of blunt-tipped versus cutting needles to reduce glove puncture during mass closure of the abdomenBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Reducing the risk of infection for obstetriciansBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991