Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 342 (1-2), 23-39
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccn.2003.12.015
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeClinical Chemistry, 2003
- Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferableBMJ, 2002
- Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficientThe Lancet, 2000
- Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Tests With Imperfect Reference StandardsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Screening Women for Chlamydia trachomatis in Family Planning ClinicsSexually Transmitted Diseases, 1998
- A clinical approach for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: an analysis using glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Meta-analysis Research Group on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Using Glycated Hemoglobin LevelsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not goodPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1994
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994