On the Ethical Justification for the Use of Risk Acceptance Criteria
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 27 (2), 303-312
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00883.x
Abstract
To protect people from hazards, the common safety regulation regime in many industries is based on the use of minimum standards formulated as risk acceptance or tolerability limits. The limits are seen as absolute, and in principle these should be met regardless of costs. The justification is ethical—people should not be exposed to a risk level exceeding certain limits. In this article, we discuss this approach to safety regulation and its justification. We argue that the use of such limits is based on some critical assumptions; that low accident risk has a value in itself, that risk can be accurately measured and the authorities specify the limits. However, these assumptions are not in general valid, and hence the justification of the approach can be questioned. In the article, we look closer into these issues, and we conclude that there is a need for rethinking this regulation approach—its ethical justification is not stronger than for alternative approaches. Essential for the analysis is the distinction between ethics of the mind and ethics of the consequences, which has several implications that are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- On The Precautionary Principle, In The Context of Different Perspectives on RiskRisk Management, 2006
- Overall strategy for risk evaluation and priority setting of risk regulationsReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2006
- On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industryReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005
- Perspectives on risk: review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approachReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005
- Use of risk acceptance criteria in Norwegian offshore industry: Dilemmas and challengesRisk Decision and Policy, 2004
- Social and economic criteria of acceptable riskReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2002
- On the ALARP approach to risk managementReliability Engineering & System Safety, 2001
- Editorial Risk perception versus risk analysisReliability Engineering & System Safety, 1998
- Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal riskJournal of Risk Research, 1998
- Risk evaluation: criteria arising from legal traditions and experience with quantitative risk assessment in the United StatesEnvironmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1996