Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 62 (7), 1474-1484
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212147
Abstract
Extant models of oculomotor control during reading maintain that allocation of attention confines word recognition to one (target) word at a time, and that an eye movement to a new (posttarget) word is computed before attention is shifted to it. To test these assumptions, properties of the posttarget’s preview were manipulated during the fixation of the preceding target word. The main results revealed longer target viewing durations when the posttarget preview was visually distinctive or when it was orthographically illegal. The meaning of posttarget text did not affect initial target word reading, although it affected the time spent rereading the target. To account for these findings, extant attention-shift models must assume that readers obtain at least visuospatial and orthographic information from a parafovelly visible word before it is attended. This view has shortcomings, however, and several considerations favor less restrictive model assumptions according to which attention can be allocated to more than one word at a time.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complex Compounds in German: Interword Spaces Facilitate Segmentation but Hinder Assignment of MeaningJournal of Memory and Language, 2000
- Allocation of Visuo-Spatial Attention and Saccade Programming During ReadingPublished by Elsevier BV ,2000
- Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistencePsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1998
- The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1998
- Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995
- Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 1993
- Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990
- Covert Attention and Eye Movements during ReadingThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1989
- Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequencyPerception & Psychophysics, 1986
- Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetrackerApplied Optics, 1985