Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Postoperative Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Pilot Study in Breast Augmentation Patients
- 28 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
- Vol. 32 (4), 660-666
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9169-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nitroparacetamol (NCX-701) and Pain: First in a Series of Novel AnalgesicsCNS Drug Reviews, 2007
- Pain relief following breast augmentation surgery: a comparison between incisional patient-controlled regional analgesia and traditional oral analgesiaEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2006
- Achieving a Predictable 24-Hour Return to Normal Activities after Breast Augmentation: Part II. Patient Preparation, Refined Surgical Techniques, and InstrumentationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2006
- Analgesic efficacy of the cyclooxygenase-inhibiting nitric oxide donor AZD3582 in postoperative dental pain: Comparison with naproxen and rofecoxib in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studiesClinical Therapeutics, 2006
- Electromagnetic Fields Inhibit Endothelin-1 Production Stimulated by Thrombin in Endothelial CellsJournal of International Medical Research, 2005
- The efficacy of bupivacaine with adrenaline in reducing pain and bleeding associated with breast reduction: a prospective trialBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1999
- EMF signals and ion/ligand binding kinetics: prediction of bioeffective waveform parametersBioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 1999
- Effect of Pulsed Radio Frequency Stimulation on Wound Healing: A Double-Blind Pilot Clinical StudyPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1999
- Survey of postoperative analgesia following ambulatory surgeryActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1997
- A portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trialBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1992