Why deposits of longitudinal dunes are rarely recognized in the geologic record
- 1 February 1985
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Sedimentology
- Vol. 32 (1), 147-157
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1985.tb00498.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors determining desert dune type (reply)Nature, 1984
- Aeolian sands in continental red beds of the Middle Buntsandstein (Lower Triassic) at the western margin of the German BasinSedimentary Geology, 1982
- Sand waves: A model of origin and internal structureSedimentary Geology, 1980
- Eolian dune field of Late Triassic age, Fundy Basin, Nova ScotiaGeology, 1980
- Morphology and Sediments of the Nebraska Sand Hills in Relation to Pleistocene Winds and the Development of Aeolian BedformsThe Journal of Geology, 1976
- Dinosaur- and mammal-bearing aeolian and associated deposits of the Upper Cretaceous in the Gobi Desert (Mongolia)Sedimentary Geology, 1974
- Dome-shaped aeolian dunes in the frodsham member of the so-called “keuper” sandstone formation (scythian-anisian: triassic) at Frodsham, Cheshire (England)Sedimentary Geology, 1969
- WIND DIRECTION IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES IN THE LATE PALEOZOICGSA Bulletin, 1960
- A Tentative Classification of Sand Dunes Its Application to Dune History in the Southern High PlainsThe Journal of Geology, 1940
- The Lower Bunter Sandstones of North Worcestershire and East ShropshireGeological Magazine, 1937