Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening With 32-Channel Multidetector Computed Tomography
- 1 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 253 (3), 444-450
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e31820d946b
Abstract
We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) using 32-channel multidetector computed tomography for blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs). Unrecognized BCVI is a cause of stroke in young trauma patients. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), the reference standard, is invasive, expensive, and time-consuming. Computed tomographic angiography has been rapidly adopted by many institutions because of its availability, less resource intensive, and noninvasive nature. However, conflicting results comparing CTA and DSA have been reported. Studies with 16-channel CTA report a wide range of sensitivities for BCVI diagnosis. From January 2007 through May 2009, patients with risk factors for BCVI underwent both CTA and DSA. All CTAs were performed using a 32-channel multidetector CT scanner. Using DSA as the reference standard, the diagnostic accuracy of CTA for determination of BCVI was calculated. There were 684 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Ninety patients (13%) had 109 injuries identified; 52 carotid and 57 vertebral injuries were diagnosed. CTA failed to detect 53 confirmed BCVI, yielding a sensitivity of 51%. Given the devastation of stroke, and high mortality from missed injuries, this study demonstrates that even with more advanced technology (32 vs 16 channel), CTA is inadequate for BCVI screening. Digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of BCVI.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Screening for and Treatment of Blunt Cerebrovascular InjuriesThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2009
- Computed Tomographic Angiography Versus Conventional Angiography for the Diagnosis of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury in Trauma PatientsThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2009
- Screening Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography in the Evaluation on Blunt Neck Injuries: An Evidence-Based ApproachSeminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, 2009
- Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissection: A ReviewCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 2008
- Diagnosis of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries with 16-MDCT: Accuracy of Whole-Body MDCT Compared with Neck MDCT AngiographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2008
- Sixteen-Slice CT Angiography in Patients with Suspected Blunt Carotid and Vertebral Artery InjuriesJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2006
- Sixteen-Slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomographic Angiography Improves the Accuracy of Screening for Blunt Cerebrovascular InjuryThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2006
- Sixteen-Slice Computed Tomographic Angiography is a Reliable Noninvasive Screening Test for Clinically Significant Blunt Cerebrovascular InjuriesThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2006
- Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries is cost-effectiveThe American Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Treatment-Related Outcomes From Blunt Cerebrovascular InjuriesAnnals of Surgery, 2002