Interactions of task and subject variables among continuous performance tests
- 16 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Vol. 46 (4), 420-435
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00362.x
Abstract
Background: Contemporary models of working memory suggest that target paradigm (TP) and target density (TD) should interact as influences on error rates derived from continuous performance tests (CPTs). The present study evaluated this hypothesis empirically in a typically developing, ethnically diverse sample of children. The extent to which scores based on different combinations of these task parameters showed different patterns of relationship to age, intelligence, and gender was also assessed. Methods: Four continuous performance tests were derived by combining two target paradigms (AX and repeated letter target stimuli) with two levels of target density (8.3% and 33%). Variations in mean omission (OE) and commission (CE) error rates were examined within and across combinations of TP and TD. In addition, a nested series of structural equation models was utilized to examine patterns of relationship among error rates, age, intelligence, and gender. Results: Target paradigm and target density interacted as influences on error rates. Increasing density resulted in higher OE and CE rates for the AX paradigm. In contrast, the high density condition yielded a decline in OE rates accompanied by a small increase in CEs using the repeated letter CPT. Target paradigms were also distinguishable on the basis of age when using OEs as the performance measure, whereas combinations of age and intelligence distinguished between density levels but not target paradigms using CEs as the dependent measure. Conclusions: Different combinations of target paradigm and target density appear to yield scores that are conceptually and psychometrically distinguishable. Consequently, developmentally appropriate interpretation of error rates across tasks may require (a) careful analysis of working memory and attentional resources required for successful performance, and (b) normative data bases that are differently stratified with respect to combinations of age and intelligence.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- The continuous performance test: a window on the neural substrates for attention?Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2002
- Continuous Performance Test Results of Adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1998
- Attention performance in an epidemiological sample of urban children: The role of gender and verbal intelligenceChild Neuropsychology, 1997
- Computerized assessment of sustained attention: A review of factors affecting vigilance performanceJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1996
- Differential diagnosis of ADHD: Are objective measures of attention, impulsivity, and activity level helpful?Child Neuropsychology, 1995
- Developmental analysis of three aspects of information processing: Sustained attention, selective attention, and response organizationDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 1994
- Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitSociological Methods & Research, 1992
- Differences in attention control between ‘clinic‐observable’ and ‘reported’ hyperactivity: a preliminary reportChild: Care, Health and Development, 1988
- Sustained Attention as a Predictor of Low Academic Readiness in a Preschool PopultionJournal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1987
- The Determination of the Significance of Change Between Pre- and Posttesting PeriodsReview of Educational Research, 1977