Left Truncation Bias as a Potential Explanation for the Protective Effect of Smoking on Preeclampsia
Open Access
- 1 May 2015
- journal article
- reproduction
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Epidemiology
- Vol. 26 (3), 436-440
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000268
Abstract
Background: We carried out a study to examine whether left truncation bias could explain the negative association between smoking and preeclampsia. Methods: Monte Carlo and other simulation models were used to determine the effect of differential rates of early pregnancy loss among smokers on the relation between smoking and preeclampsia at ≥20 weeks’ gestation. Assumptions included no association between smoking and the abnormal placentation that characterizes preeclampsia, and higher rates of early pregnancy loss among smokers, pregnancies with abnormal placentation, and smokers with abnormal placentation. Results: Monte Carlo simulation yielded a rate ratio for preeclampsia, given smoking of 0.85 (95% confidence interval = 0.73, 0.98). The protective effect of smoking was also evident in simulations that did not require assumptions about early pregnancy loss rates. Conclusion: Left truncation bias due to differential rates of early pregnancy loss among smokers is a plausible explanation for the inverse association between maternal smoking and preeclampsia.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competing risk bias to explain the inverse relationship between smoking and malignant melanomaEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Effect of older maternal age on birth outcomes in twin pregnancies: a population-based studyJournal of Perinatology, 2010
- Tobacco Use During Pregnancy and Preeclampsia RiskHypertension, 2010
- Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a colliderInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Is the association of maternal smoking and pregnancy-induced hypertension dependent on fetal growth?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Smoking and risk of preeclampsia: a systematic reviewFrontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 2007
- Pre-eclampsiaThe Lancet, 2005
- BiasJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- Neyman's bias re-visitedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Efficiency and Bias in Studies of Early Pregnancy LossEpidemiology, 1992