A Multicenter Matched Comparison of Transanal and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Low-rectal Adenocarcinoma
- 1 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 270 (6), 1110-1116
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002862
Abstract
To compare the quality of surgical resection of transanal total mesorectal excision (TA-TME) and robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME). Both TA-TME and R-TME have been advocated to improve the quality of surgery for rectal cancer below 10 cm from the anal verge, but there are little data comparing TA-TME and R-TME. Data of patients undergoing TA-TME or R-TME for rectal cancer below 10 cm from the anal verge and a sphincter-saving procedure from 5 high-volume rectal cancer referral centers between 2011 and 2017 were obtained. Coarsened exact matching was used to create balanced cohorts of TA-TME and R-TME. The main outcome was the incidence of poor-quality surgical resection, defined as a composite measure including incomplete quality of TME, or positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) or distal resection margin (DRM). Out of a total of 730 patients (277 TA-TME, 453 R-TME), matched groups of 226 TA-TME and 370 R-TME patients were created. These groups were well-balanced. The mean tumor height from the anal verge was 5.6 cm (SD 2.5), and 70% received preoperative radiotherapy. The incidence of poor-quality resection was similar in both groups (TA-TME 6.9% vs R-TME 6.8%; P = 0.954). There were no differences in TME specimen quality (complete or near-complete TA-TME 99.1% vs R-TME 99.2%; P = 0.923) and CRM (5.6% vs 6.0%; P = 0.839). DRM involvement may be higher after TA-TME (1.8% vs 0.3%; P = 0.051). High-quality TME for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma of the mid and low rectum can be equally achieved by transanal or robotic approaches in skilled hands, but attention should be paid to the distal margin.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring Robust Methods for Evaluating Treatment and Comparison Groups in Chronic Care Management ProgramsPopulation Health Management, 2013
- Maximizing Rectal Cancer Results: TEM and TATA Techniques to Expand Sphincter PreservationSurgical Oncology Clinics of North America, 2011
- Factors Predicting the Quality of Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2010
- Laparoscopic transanal abdominal transanal resection with sphincter preservation for rectal cancer in the distal 3 cm of the rectum after neoadjuvant therapySurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Deaths from heart failure: using coarsened exact matching to correct cause-of-death statisticsPopulation Health Metrics, 2010
- Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trialThe Lancet, 2009
- The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conferenceSurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Presence of distal intramural spread after preoperative combined-modality therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum: What is now the appropriate distal resection margin?Surgery, 2005
- Pathological response following long‐course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancerHistopathology, 2005
- The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence?British Journal of Surgery, 1982