Assessment of Ergonomic Strain and Positioning During Bronchoscopic Procedures A Feasibility Study
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology
- Vol. 27 (1), 58-67
- https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000615
Abstract
Background: Poor ergonomics place health care workers at risk for work-related overuse injuries. Repetitive and prolonged hand maneuvers, such as those performed during endoscopic procedures, may lead to musculoskeletal complaints and work-related injuries. However, the prevalence of health care-related work injuries among physicians is thought to be underreported and there is a paucity of literature investigating the impact of ergonomic strain on bronchoscopy. We designed a feasibility study to explore the differences in ergonomic strain and muscle activity of bronchoscopists. Materials and Methods: A prospective study of bronchoscopic procedures was performed in a simulated environment. Preselected target areas were identified and airway sampling was performed with real-time ergonomic assessment utilizing electromyogram (EMG), grip strength, and musculoskeletal use and motion analysis. Results: Procedural data was obtained for all procedures (78 bronchoscopies by 13 subjects) for both ergonomic and EMG scores. Experienced bronchoscopists demonstrated less EMG burden (P=0.007) and improved ergonomic positioning (P=0.007) during bronchoscopy when compared with less experienced bronchoscopists. Procedures performed with rotational-head bronchoscopes trended toward improved ergonomics (P=0.15) and lower EMG scores (P=0.88). A significant improvement in ergonomic scores was seen with the rotational-head bronchoscope when targeting the left upper lobe (P=0.036). Conclusion: Poor ergonomic positioning and excessive muscle strain appear present within bronchoscopy procedures but may be improved in those with more bronchoscopy experience. Technological advances in bronchoscope design may also have the potential to improve procedural ergonomics. Additional prospective studies are warranted to define the long-term impact on bronchoscopic ergonomics.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disabling musculoskeletal pain in working populations: Is it the job, the person, or the culture?Pain, 2013
- Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Gel Mat Foot Pads in the Endoscopic SuiteJournal of Endourology, 2011
- Bronchoscopy and Overuse InjurySocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2011
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing positionSurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Ergonomics and GI endoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- Procedure-related musculoskeletal symptoms in gastrointestinal endoscopists in KoreaWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008
- Assessment of dental student posture in two seating conditions using RULA methodology – a pilot studyBritish Dental Journal, 2007
- Overuse Syndromes Among EndoscopistsEndoscopy, 1994
- RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disordersApplied Ergonomics, 1993