Muddling through and policy analysis*
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in New Zealand Economic Papers
- Vol. 37 (2), 197-215
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00779950309544384
Abstract
In a variety of books and articles, both published and in process, I've been out pushing the idea of the “economics of muddling through “ as the description of the approach to policy that will become standard in economics over the next 20 or 30 years. The argument is both prescriptive ‐ I argue muddling through is what should be done ‐ and descriptive ‐ I argue that muddling through is what is currently being done, although, like Monsieur Jourdain speaking prose in Molière ‘s Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme, many economists don't recognize that that's what they are doing.1 If we've been muddlers for so long, why should we be willing to admit it now? I think there are three reasons. • First, there is a change occurring in formal theorizing in which the holy trinity ‐rationality, greed, and equilibrium ‐ is being abandoned as required aspects of any model, and being replaced by a slightly broader trinity‐purposeful behavior, enlightened self‐interest, and sustainability.2 • Second, the work in the formal general equilibrium model built upon the foundation of the holy trinity has been thoroughly explored; all the low hanging fruit has been picked, and young theoretical researchers are naturally gravitating to less explored areas. • Third, today's muddling through is not your father's muddling through; it involves the use of a whole range of applied mathematics that is difficult to use unless we admit we are muddling. Today's muddling is technically impressive muddling and is afar cry from the armchair heuristics that characterized early muddling. The paper is organized as follows: First I consider the history of welfare economics, providing a narrative of how we got to where we are. Second, I briefly outline some important changes that are currently occurring in economics. Third, I expand on my reasons for believing that we are now ready to accept a “muddling through” characterization of applied policy, something we have not previously been willing to embrace.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Changing Face of EconomicsPublished by University of Michigan Library ,2004
- Macroeconomic PrioritiesAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- How Economics Became a Mathematical SciencePublished by Duke University Press ,2002
- The Death of Neoclassical EconomicsJournal of the History of Economic Thought, 2000
- Complexity and the History of Economic ThoughtPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2000
- The Possibility of Social ChoiceAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- Foundations of Complex-system TheoriesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1998
- The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and CollaborationPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1997
- Essays on Economics and EconomistsPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1994
- The Impossibility of a Paretian LiberalJournal of Political Economy, 1970