Integrating vital rates explains optimal worker size for resource return by bumblebee workers
- 24 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Functional Ecology
- Vol. 33 (3), 467-478
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13251
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Tufts University
- National Science Foundation (DEB1354022, DEB1411420)
- Williams (DEB1354022, DEB1411420)
- University of California, Davis
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency?Animal Behaviour, 2002
- MODELS OFDIVISION OFLABOR INSOCIALINSECTSAnnual Review of Entomology, 2001
- Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animalsBird Study, 1999
- Field evidence that host selection by conopid parasitoids is related to host body sizeInsectes Sociaux, 1996
- The effect of workers size frequency distribution on colony development inBombus terrestrisInsectes Sociaux, 1994
- Latitudinal Clines: A Trade‐Off between Egg Number and Size in Pacific SalmonEcology, 1990
- Trade-Offs in Life-History EvolutionFunctional Ecology, 1989
- A note on the multiple-recapture censusBiometrika, 1965
- Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic modelBiometrika, 1965
- Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animalsBiometrika, 1964