Racial and Ethnic Differences in Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Cancer: Impact of Terminal Illness Acknowledgment, Religiousness, and Treatment Preferences
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (25), 4131-4137
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.14.8452
Abstract
Despite well-documented racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning (ACP), we know little about why these differences exist. This study tested proposed mediators of racial/ethnic differences in ACP. We studied 312 non-Hispanic white, 83 non-Hispanic black, and 73 Hispanic patients with advanced cancer in the Coping with Cancer study, a federally funded multisite prospective cohort study designed to examine racial/ethnic disparities in ACP and end-of-life care. We assessed the impact of terminal illness acknowledgment, religiousness, and treatment preferences on racial/ethnic differences in ACP. Compared with white patients, black and Hispanic patients were less likely to have an ACP (white patients, 80%; black patients, 47%; Hispanic patients, 47%) and more likely to want life-prolonging care even if he or she had only a few days left to live (white patients, 14%; black patients, 45%; Hispanic patients, 34%) and to consider religion very important (white patients, 44%; black patients, 88%; Hispanic patients, 73%; all P < .001, comparison of black or Hispanic patients with white patients). Hispanic patients were less likely and black patients marginally less likely to acknowledge their terminally ill status (white patients, 39% v Hispanic patients, 11%; P < .001; white v black patients, 27%; P = .05). Racial/ethnic differences in ACP persisted after adjustment for clinical and demographic factors, terminal illness acknowledgment, religiousness, and treatment preferences (has ACP, black v white patients, adjusted relative risk, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.83]; Hispanic v white patients, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.89]). Although black and Hispanic patients are less likely to consider themselves terminally ill and more likely to want intensive treatment, these factors did not explain observed disparities in ACP.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- An advance directive redesigned to meet the literacy level of most adults: A randomized trialPatient Education and Counseling, 2007
- Differences in the Quality of the Patient–Physician Relationship Among Terminally Ill African-American and White Patients: Impact on Advance Care Planning and Treatment PreferencesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Implicit Bias among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White PatientsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Religiousness and Spiritual Support Among Advanced Cancer Patients and Associations With End-of-Life Treatment Preferences and Quality of LifeJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Peaceful Awareness in Patients with Advanced CancerJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2006
- Distrust and Poor Self-Reported Health. Canaries in the Coal Mine?Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Easy SAS Calculations for Risk or Prevalence Ratios and DifferencesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Sociodemographic determinants of cancer treatment health literacyCancer, 2005
- Preferences of Physicians and Their Patients for End-of-Life CareJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1997
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986