Comparative analysis of otolith morphology in three species of Scomber
- 31 October 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Ichthyological Research
- Vol. 65 (2), 192-201
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-017-0605-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology (cstc2016jcyjA0327)
- Ecological Fishery Industrial Technology System Project from Chongqing Municipal Agriculture Commission
- China Scholarship Council (201508505111)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (2015DFR30450, 201505025, 41776171)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Otolith morphology varies between populations, sexes and male alternative reproductive tactics in a vocal toadfish Porichthys notatusJournal of Fish Biology, 2016
- Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in three species of south Caspian gobiesJournal of Fish Biology, 2013
- Molecular phylogeny and evolution of Scomber (Teleostei: Scombridae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequencesChinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2011
- Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’Italian Journal of Zoology, 2004
- Photographic Atlas of Fish Otoliths of the Northwest Atlantic OceanPublished by Canadian Science Publishing ,2004
- The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identificationFisheries Research, 1999
- An holistic approach to fish stock identificationFisheries Research, 1999
- Stock Discrimination Using Otolith Shape AnalysisCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1993
- Usefulness of Fourier Analysis of Otolith Shape for Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) Stock DiscriminationCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1991
- Comparisons of Herring Otoliths Using Fourier Series Shape AnalysisCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1986