The Impact of Negative Campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 Senatorial Primaries
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Research Quarterly
- Vol. 55 (4), 845-860
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500406
Abstract
We investigate the amount of negative campaigning in the 1998 senato- rial primaries and the ramifications of negative campaigning on primary turnout and general election outcomes. A large literature has developed to show whether primary divisiveness has significant consequences for electoral outcomes, though we do not have much knowledge about what primary divisiveness entails (Bernstein 1977: 540). We employ a holistic measure of campaign negativity measured by coding newspaper articles three months prior to the primary to uncover how much negativity exists in senatorial primaries, which campaigns turn negative, and the relation- ship between primary negativity and several campaign factors. We find that primary divisiveness is strongly related to campaign negativity, neg- ativity boosts primary turnout, while divisiveness depletes a nominee's general election fortunes.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and TurnoutAmerican Political Science Review, 1999
- Divisive Nominating Mechanisms and Democratic Party Electoral ProspectsThe Journal of Politics, 1995
- Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?American Political Science Review, 1994
- Political Advertising and News Coverage in the 1992 California U.S. Senate CampaignsThe Journal of Politics, 1994
- Divisive Primaries and Party Activists: Kentucky, 1979 and 1983The Journal of Politics, 1988
- The Relationship between Divisive Primaries and General Election OutcomesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1987
- Divisive Primaries and Participation in Fall Presidential CampaignsAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1986
- Divisive Primaries Do Hurt: U.S. Senate Races, 1956—1972American Political Science Review, 1977
- The Divisive Primary Revisited: Party Activists in IowaAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Does a “Divisive” Primary Harm a Candidate's Election Chances?American Political Science Review, 1965