Statistical significance and fragility criteria for assessing a difference of two proportions
- 31 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 44 (12), 1373-1378
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90098-t
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The unit fragility index: An additional appraisal of “statistical significance” for a contrast of two proportionsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- MAGIC OF p VALUESThe Lancet, 1988
- The Effect of Sample Size on the Meaning of Significance TestsThe American Statistician, 1986
- A proposal for interpreting and reporting negative studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1986
- Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.BMJ, 1986
- Statistics: necessary and importantBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986
- Exact Unconditional Sample Sizes for the 2 × 2 Binomial TrialJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1985
- Are Uniformly Most Powerful Unbiased Tests Really Best?The American Statistician, 1984
- Clinical Trials and Statistical Verdicts: Probable Grounds for AppealAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1978