Multidisciplinary Discussion and Management of Rectal Cancer: A Population‐based Study
Open Access
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 35 (9), 2125-2133
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1181-9
Abstract
Background The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the value of discussing rectal cancer patients in a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Methods All treated rectal cancer patients (>T1M0) diagnosed in 2006–2008 were included. According to the national guidelines, neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy should be given to all rectal cancer patients. Patients were scored as “discussed” (MDT+) only if documented proof was available. The primary endpoint was the number of positive circumferential resection margins (CRM ≤1 mm). Results Of the 275 patients included, 210 were analyzed (exclusions: (recto)sigmoid tumor, acute laparotomy, and inoperability). Neoadjuvant treatment was applied in 174 (83%) patients and followed by total mesorectal excision in 171 (81%) patients. Patients considered not to require downstaging, received short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) (n = 116) or no radiotherapy (no RT) (n = 36), whereas 58 more advanced patients received chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The MDT discussion took place in 116 cases (55%). In the MDT+ group an MRI was used more often (p = 0.001) and TNM staging was more complete (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with advanced disease was higher in the MDT+ group (88% ≥T3/N+ versus 68%; p = 0.001). The overall CRM+ rate was 13% and did not differ between the MDT+ and the MDT− group (p = 0.392). In patients receiving SCRT or no RT, the CRM+ rate was 10%, whereas the rate was 20% for patients receiving CRT. Conclusions Although no difference in CRM+ rate was found for those patients who were discussed and those who were not, our results demonstrate room for improvement, especially in the selection of patients for SCRT or no RT. We advocate standardized documentation of treatment decisions and pathology reports.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Two Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Regimens for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of the Phase III Trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Chemotherapy with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?British Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Radiotherapy does not compensate for positive resection margins in rectal cancer patients: report of a multicenter randomized trialInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2003
- Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imagingBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Rates of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement Vary Between Surgeons and Predict Outcomes in Rectal Cancer SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgeryThe Lancet, 2001
- The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examinationInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1988
- RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCERThe Lancet, 1986