What role should the concept of risk play in theories of accident involvement?
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Ergonomics
- Vol. 31 (4), 469-484
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138808966692
Abstract
Recently a great deal of emphasis has been placed on the role of risk in theories of accident involvement. This may be exemplified by risk homeostasis theory, which argues that the level of risk people are willing to accept is the sole determining factor in overall accident involvement. The evidence for and against this position is reviewed and it is concluded that there is little evidence in favour of the theory. Several theoretical and methodological inconsistencies are noted. It is concluded that an increased knowledge of the limitations of human risk perception will prove useful in understanding how people react to human error and accident involvement.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk Homeostasis Theory and Traffic Accident DataRisk Analysis, 1986
- Comments on Wilde's Notes on “Risk Homeostasis Theory and Traffic Accident Data”Risk Analysis, 1986
- Technology, behavior, and safety: An empirical study of automobile occupant-protection regulationPolicy Sciences, 1984
- Defining riskPolicy Sciences, 1984
- Field dependence, sensation seeking and driving behaviourPersonality and Individual Differences, 1984
- Public Safety Legislation and the Risk Compensation Hypothesis: The Example of Motorcycle Helmet LegislationEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1983
- The Influence of Visual Pattern on Perceived SpeedPerception, 1980
- Evaluation of automobile safety regulations: The case of compulsory seat belt legislation in AustraliaPolicy Sciences, 1980
- Applicability of drivers' electrodermal response to the design of the traffic environment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- MEASURING THE SPARE ‘MENTAL CAPACITY ’OF CAR DRIVERS BY A SUBSIDIARY TASKErgonomics, 1961