Evaluation of Selection Bias in an Internet-based Study of Pregnancy Planners
- 1 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Epidemiology
- Vol. 27 (1), 98-104
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000400
Abstract
Selection bias is a potential concern in all epidemiologic studies, but it is usually difficult to assess. Recently, concerns have been raised that internet-based prospective cohort studies may be particularly prone to selection bias. Although use of the internet is efficient and facilitates recruitment of subjects that are otherwise difficult to enroll, any compromise in internal validity would be of great concern. Few studies have evaluated selection bias in internet-based prospective cohort studies. Using data from the Danish Medical Birth Registry from 2008 to 2012, we compared six well-known perinatal associations (e.g., smoking and birth weight) in an internet-based preconception cohort (Snart Gravid n = 4,801) with the total population of singleton live births in the registry (n = 239,791). We used log-binomial models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each association. We found that most results in both populations were very similar. For example, maternal obesity was associated with an increased risk of delivering a macrosomic infant in Snart Gravid (RR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.7) and the total population (RR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.45, 1.53), and maternal smoking of >10 cigarettes per day was associated with a higher risk of low birth weight (RR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.2, 5.9 vs. RR = 2.9; 95% CI: 2.6, 3.1) in Snart Gravid and the total population, respectively. We cannot be certain that our results would apply to other associations or different populations. Nevertheless, our results suggest that recruitment of reproductive aged women via the internet may be no more prone to selection bias than traditional methods of recruitment.This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Participant Profiles According to Recruitment Source in a Large Web-Based Prospective Study: Experience From the Nutrinet-Santé StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- A successful implementation of e-epidemiology: the Danish pregnancy planning study ‘Snart-Gravid’European Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Effects of self‐reported health conditions and pesticide exposures on probability of follow‐up in a prospective cohort studyAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2009
- Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a colliderInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- An internet-based prospective study of body size and time-to-pregnancyHuman Reproduction, 2009
- Quantification of collider‐stratification bias and the birthweight paradoxPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2009
- Cohort Profile: The Danish Web-based Pregnancy Planning Study--'Snart-Gravid'International Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural ModelsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohortEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- New times, new needs; e-epidemiologyEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2007