Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis
Open Access
- 14 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 66 (646), e315-e322
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X684961
Abstract
Background Differentiating between type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to ensuring appropriate management of patients, but can be challenging, especially when treating with insulin. The 2010 UK Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes were developed to help make the differentiation. Aim To assess diagnostic accuracy of the UK guidelines against ‘gold standard’ definitions of type 1 and type 2 diabetes based on measured C-peptide levels. Design and setting In total, 601 adults with insulin-treated diabetes and diabetes duration ≥5 years were recruited in Devon, Northamptonshire, and Leicestershire. Method Baseline information and home urine sample were collected. Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) measures endogenous insulin production. Gold standard type 1 diabetes was defined as continuous insulin treatment within 3 years of diagnosis and absolute insulin deficiency (UCPCRResults UK guidelines correctly classified 86% of participants. Most misclassifications occurred in patients classed as having type 1 diabetes who had significant endogenous insulin levels (57 out of 601; 9%); most in those diagnosed ≥35 years and treated with insulin from diagnosis, where 37 out of 66 (56%) were misclassified. Time to insulin and age at diagnosis performed best in predicting long-term endogenous insulin production (ROC AUC = 0.904 and 0.871); BMI was a less strong predictor of diabetes type (AUC = 0.824). Conclusion Current UK guidelines provide a pragmatic clinical approach to classification reflecting long-term endogenous insulin production; caution is needed in older patients commencing insulin from diagnosis, where misclassification rates are increased.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2012
- Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2013Diabetes Care, 2012
- Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Patient-Centered ApproachDiabetes Care, 2012
- Validation of a single‐sample urinary C‐peptide creatinine ratio as a reproducible alternative to serum C‐peptide in patients with Type 2 diabetesDiabetic Medicine, 2011
- National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9·1 million participantsThe Lancet, 2011
- Urine C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio Is a Noninvasive Alternative to the Mixed-Meal Tolerance Test in Children and Adults With Type 1 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2011
- Incorrect and incomplete coding and classification of diabetes: a systematic reviewDiabetic Medicine, 2010
- A method of identifying and correcting miscoding, misclassification and misdiagnosis in diabetes: a pilot and validation study of routinely collected dataDiabetic Medicine, 2010
- Best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the youngDiabetologia, 2008
- Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1995