Errors in the administration of intravenous medications in hospital and the role of correct procedures and nurse experience
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Quality & Safety
- Vol. 20 (12), 1027-1034
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000089
Abstract
Background Intravenous medication administrations have a high incidence of error but there is limited evidence of associated factors or error severity. Objective To measure the frequency, type and severity of intravenous administration errors in hospitals and the associations between errors, procedural failures and nurse experience. Methods Prospective observational study of 107 nurses preparing and administering 568 intravenous medications on six wards across two teaching hospitals. Procedural failures (eg, checking patient identification) and clinical intravenous errors (eg, wrong intravenous administration rate) were identified and categorised by severity. Results Of 568 intravenous administrations, 69.7% (n=396; 95% CI 65.9 to 73.5) had at least one clinical error and 25.5% (95% CI 21.2 to 29.8) of these were serious. Four error types (wrong intravenous rate, mixture, volume, and drug incompatibility) accounted for 91.7% of errors. Wrong rate was the most frequent and accounted for 95 of 101 serious errors. Error rates and severity decreased with clinical experience. Each year of experience, up to 6 years, reduced the risk of error by 10.9% and serious error by 18.5%. Administration by bolus was associated with a 312% increased risk of error. Patient identification was only checked in 47.9% of administrations but was associated with a 56% reduction in intravenous error risk. Conclusions Intravenous administrations have a higher risk and severity of error than other medication administrations. A significant proportion of errors suggest skill and knowledge deficiencies, with errors and severity reducing as clinical experience increases. A proportion of errors are also associated with routine violations which are likely to be learnt workplace behaviours. Both areas suggest specific targets for intervention.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- When the 5 Rights Go WrongJournal of Nursing Care Quality, 2010
- Do calculation errors by nurses cause medication errors in clinical practice? A literature reviewNurse Education Today, 2010
- Where errors occur in the preparation and administration of intravenous medicines: a systematic review and Bayesian analysisQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2010
- The Use of Smart Pumps for Preventing Medication ErrorsJournal of Infusion Nursing, 2009
- Vancomycin administration: mistakes made by nursing staffNursing Standard, 2008
- Direct Observations of Nursing Home Care Quality: Does Care Change When Observed?Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2006
- Factors predictive of intravenous fluid administration errors in Australian surgical care wardsPublished by BMJ ,2005
- Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic)CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic studyQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errorsBMJ, 2003