Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within‐study comparisons
Top Cited Papers
- 29 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
- Vol. 27 (4), 724-750
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20375
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- How close is close enough? Evaluating propensity score matching using data from a class size reduction experimentJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2007
- A Comparison of Experimental and Observational Data AnalysesPublished by Wiley ,2004
- Are Experiments the Only Option? A Look at Dropout Prevention ProgramsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004
- Nonexperimental Versus Experimental Estimates of Earnings ImpactsThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2003
- Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity DesignEconometrica, 2001
- Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training ProgramsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- The Pre‐programme Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Programme. Implications for Simple Programme Evaluation StrategiesThe Economic Journal, 1999
- Comparison of a Randomized and Two Quasi-Experimental Designs in a Single Outcome EvaluationEvaluation Review, 1998
- The Adequacy of Comparison Group Designs for Evaluations of Employment-Related ProgramsThe Journal of Human Resources, 1987
- Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programsPreventive Medicine, 1986