Fahrenheit 59
- 30 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Benchmarking: An International Journal
- Vol. 15 (3), 307-325
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770810876610
Abstract
Purpose: The overwhelming majority of scientists agree the earth's temperature has risen during the past century. Nature maintains a balance to keep the earth's average surface temperature at 59 degrees Fahrenheit. About 59 degrees is to earth what 98.6 degrees is to our body. Although, the fact that the earth's temperature has risen is generally not in dispute by scientists, environmental decisions remain among the most difficult facing policy makers. Fahrenheit 59 is an environmental decision support system developed at Johnson Space Center for benchmarking global warming. This paper aims to present the details of the benchmarking model embedded in Fahrenheit 59.Design/methodology/approach: The model attempts to establish benchmark scores that are weighted sum measures of subjective and intrinsic weights and performance scores associated with a series of global warming opportunities and threats. Fahrenheit 59 has the potential to monitor continuous progress towards countering the threat of global warming worldwide.Findings: The European Union (EU) is at the forefront of international efforts to combat global warming. The EU has been taking serious steps to address its own greenhouse gas emissions and climate changes. A pilot study conducted resulted in a benchmarking scheme that shows of the 27‐member EU states, seven were global protectors, four were global remediators, 12 were global defectors, and four were global predators.Originality/value: Fahrenheit 59 assists policy makers concerned about global warming to compare environmental performance with “best‐in‐class” achievements. The proposed system bridges the gap between technology and decision making to stimulate environmental awareness and activism.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bi‐negotiation integrated AHP in suppliers selectionBenchmarking: An International Journal, 2007
- An AHP approach in benchmarking logistics performance of the postal industryBenchmarking: An International Journal, 2006
- The Impact of Aggregating Benefit and Cost Criteria in Four MCDA MethodsIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005
- Quest 123: a benchmarking system for technology assessment at NASABenchmarking: An International Journal, 2004
- Total quality index: a benchmarking tool for total quality managementBenchmarking: An International Journal, 2003
- Using input‐output analysis for corporate benchmarkingBenchmarking: An International Journal, 2003
- Environmental performance of productsBenchmarking: An International Journal, 2003
- SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility MeasurementOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structuresJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977
- Conflict, Decision and DissonanceRevue Française de Sociologie, 1965