Evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association Renal Cell Carcinoma Surveillance Guidelines
- 20 December 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 32 (36), 4059-4065
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.56.5416
Abstract
Purpose: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Urological Association (AUA) provide guidelines for surveillance after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Herein, we assess the ability of the guidelines to capture RCC recurrences and determine the duration of surveillance required to capture 90%, 95%, and 100% of recurrences. Patients and Methods: We evaluated 3,651 patients who underwent surgery for M0 RCC between 1970 and 2008. Patients were stratified as AUA low risk (pT1Nx-0) after partial (LR-partial) or radical nephrectomy (LR-radical) or as moderate/high risk (M/HR; pT2-4Nx-0/pTanyN1). Guidelines were assessed by calculating the percentage of recurrences detected when following the 2013 and 2014 NCCN and AUA recommendations, and associated Medicare costs were compared. Results: At a median follow-up of 9.0 years (interquartile range, 5.7 to 14.4 years), a total of 1,088 patients (29.8%) experienced a recurrence. Of these, 390 recurrences (35.9%) were detected using 2013 NCCN recommendations, 742 recurrences (68.2%) were detected using 2014 NCCN recommendations, and 728 recurrences (66.9%) were detected using AUA recommendations. All protocols missed the greatest amount of recurrences in the abdomen and among pT1Nx-0 patients. To capture 95% of recurrences, surveillance was required for 15 years for LR-partial, 21 years for LR-radical, and 14 years for M/HR patients. Medicare surveillance costs for one LR-partial patient were $1,228.79 using 2013 NCCN, $2,131.52 using 2014 NCCN, and $1,738.31 using AUA guidelines. However, if 95% of LR-partial recurrences were captured, costs would total $9,856.82. Conclusion: If strictly followed, the 2014 NCCN and AUA guidelines will miss approximately one third of RCC recurrences. Improved surveillance algorithms, which balance patient benefits and health care costs, are needed.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes and Clinicopathologic Variables Associated With Late Recurrence After Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Cell CarcinomaUrology, 2011
- Postoperative surveillance for renal cell carcinoma: a multifactorial histological subtype specific protocolBJU International, 2009
- A Review on Follow-Up Strategies for Renal Cell Carcinoma after NephrectomyEuropean Urology, 2007
- POSTOPERATIVE SURVEILLANCE PROTOCOL FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED AND LOCALLY ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA BASED ON A VALIDATED PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM AND RISK GROUP STRATIFICATION SYSTEMJournal of Urology, 2005
- GUIDELINES FOR THE SURVEILLANCE OF LOCALIZED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA BASED ON THE PATTERNS OF RELAPSE AFTER NEPHRECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2004
- Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinomaCancer, 2003
- Follow‐up guidelines for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma based on the occurrence of metastases after radical nephrectomyBJU International, 1999
- STAGE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES FOR SURVEILLANCE AFTER RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR LOCAL RENAL CELL CARCINOMAJournal of Urology, 1998
- Patterns of Tumor Recurrence and Guidelines for Followup After Nephron Sparing Surgery for Sporadic Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1997
- A New Protocol for the Followup of Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Pathological StageJournal of Urology, 1995