Remixers' understandings of fair use online
- 15 February 2014
- conference paper
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14
- p. 1023-1032
- https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531695
Abstract
How do online content creators make decisions about copyright law? In the course of day-to-day online activities, Internet users are forced to make subtle judgments about one of the most confusing and nuanced areas of law, copyright and fair use. In this study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with eleven content creators who participate in remix and fan creation activities online, to try to probe their legal understandings and attitudes. We found that social norms that emerge among these content creators do not always track to what the law actually says, but are often guided more by ethical concerns. Our participants showed surprisingly similar patterns of understandings and confusions, impacting technology use and interaction online.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- #TwitterPlayPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2013
- The Remixing DilemmaAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 2012
- Computers can't give creditPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2011
- How to Suppress Women's RemixCamera Obscura, 2011
- Debunking Common Misconceptions and MythsCollege & Undergraduate Libraries, 2010
- Documentary in a Culture of Clearance: A Study of Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Copyright and Fair Use Among Norwegian Documentary MakersPopular Communication, 2010
- Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in Intellectual Property LawThe Yale Law Journal, 2007
- How Many Interviews Are Enough?Field Methods, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta CountyStanford Law Review, 1986