Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care
Open Access
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 8 (3), 184-190
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.3.184
Abstract
Clinical governance has been introduced as a new approach to quality improvement in the UK national health service. This article maps clinical governance against a discussion of the four main approaches to measuring and improving quality of care: quality assessment, quality assurance, clinical audit, and quality improvement (including continuous quality improvement). Quality assessment underpins each approach. Whereas clinical audit has, in general, been professionally led, managers have driven quality improvement initiatives. Quality assurance approaches have been perceived to be externally driven by managers or to involve professional inspection. It is discussed how clinical governance seeks to bridge these approaches. Clinical governance allows clinicians in the UK to lead a comprehensive strategy to improve quality within provider organisations, although with an expectation of greatly increased external accountability. Clinical governance aims to bring together managerial, organisational, and clinical approaches to improving quality of care. If successful, it will define a new type of professionalism for the next century. Failure by the professions to seize the opportunity is likely to result in increasingly detailed external control of clinical activity in the UK, as has occurred in some other countries.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reviewing the value of clinical audit: is now the time for a change?International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 1997
- Indicators of Quality in Health CareThe European Journal of General Practice, 1997
- The Limitations and Opportunities of Business Process Re-engineering in a Politicized Organizational ClimateHuman Relations, 1997
- Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- The Contribution of Epidemiology to CQI: a CommentaryInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1996
- Business process re‐engineering and process managementManagement Decision, 1995
- Medical audit.BMJ, 1990
- Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988
- The quality of care. How can it be assessed?JAMA, 1988