Does gender matter in valuation studies? Evidence from three forestry applications
Open Access
- 23 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
- Vol. 78 (3), 239-248
- https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpi022
Abstract
This work presents evidence from three different valuation studies on the influence of gender in the formation of forestry-related values. Previous studies examined gender differences without explicitly considering their interaction with other explanatory variables. Three separate studies dealing with forest-related goods and services, revealed statistically significant differences in peoples' preferences, especially between older women and older men, and older and younger women. In these studies, although there was no overall difference in preferences attributable to gender, there were significant differences related to age and income, in combination with gender.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a risk reduction in forest fires in a Mediterranean regionForest Policy and Economics, 2004
- Do as you say, say as you do: evidence on gender differences in actual and stated contributions to public goodsJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2000
- Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental GoodsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997
- A Randomized Response Approach to Dichotomous Choice Contingent ValuationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997
- Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- Valuing the Environment Through Contingent ValuationJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- Heterogeneous Preferences and Aggregation in Environmental Policy Analysis: A Landfill Siting CaseAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1994