Forced-choice decision-making in modified trolley dilemma situations: a virtual reality and eye tracking study
Open Access
- 16 December 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
- Vol. 8, 426
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00426
Abstract
Based on the frameworks of dual-process theories, we examined the interplay between intuitive and controlled cognitive processes related to moral and social judgments. In a virtual reality setting we performed an experiment investigating the progression from fast, automatic decisions towards more controlled decisions over multiple trials in the context of a sacrificing scenario. We repeatedly exposed participants to a modified ten-to-one version and to three one-to-one versions of the trolley dilemma in virtual reality and varied avatar properties, such as their gender and ethnicity, and their orientation in space. We also investigated the influence of arousing music on decisions. Our experiment replicated the behavioral pattern observed in studies using text versions of the trolley dilemma, thereby validating the use of virtual environments in research on moral judgments. Additionally, we found a general tendency towards sacrificing male individuals which correlated with socially desirable responding. As indicated by differences in response times, the ten-to-one version of the trolley dilemma seems to be faster to decide than decisions requiring comparisons based on specific avatar properties as a result of differing moral content. Building upon research on music-based emotion induction, we used music to induce emotional arousal on a physiological level as measured by pupil diameter. We found a specific temporal signature displaying a peak in arousal around the moment of decision. This signature occurs independently of the overall arousal level. Furthermore, we found context-dependent gaze durations during sacrificing decisions, leading participants to look prolonged at their victim if they had to choose between avatars differing in gender. Our study confirmed that moral decisions can be explained within the framework of dual-process theories and shows that pupillometric measurements are a promising tool for investigating affective responses in dilemma situations.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pupil Dilation Co-Varies with Memory Strength of Individual Traces in a Delayed Response Paired-Associate TaskPLOS ONE, 2012
- Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathyBrain Structure and Function, 2012
- Pupil dilation betrays the timing of decisionsFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2010
- The use of virtual reality in the study of people’s responses to violent incidentsFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2009
- Virtual prejudiceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008
- Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgmentCognition, 2008
- A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience ExperimentsPLOS ONE, 2006
- Gender Differences in Automatic In-Group Bias: Why Do Women Like Women More Than Men Like Men?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004
- The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review, 2001
- Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998