Operator Experience and Carotid Stenting Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries
Open Access
- 28 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 306 (12), 1338-1343
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1357
Abstract
Carotid stenting is increasingly being used to treat severe carotid atherosclerosis, an important cause of ischemic stroke.1 Since approval of the first carotid stent system by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004, use of carotid stenting has more than doubled in Medicare beneficiaries.2 Explanations for the rapid dissemination of carotid stenting into routine clinical practice include its minimally invasive nature, lack of need for general anesthesia, and an expanded pool of physicians capable of performing it.3 Yet despite its overall promise, the increasing use of carotid stenting also raises potential concern. Carotid stenting is a technically demanding procedure and earlier studies have demonstrated a substantial learning curve with it.4,5 Although this has prompted consideration of establishing minimum volume requirements and training criteria for potential operators,6-8 specific recommendations have varied across professional organizations, and none have been widely enforced.9 As such, the total number of operators currently performing carotid stenting in routine clinical practice and their overall experiences and outcomes with the procedure remain largely unknown.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The good, the bad, and the about-to-get ugly: national trends in carotid revascularization: comment on "Geographic variation in carotid revascularization among Medicare beneficiaries, 2003-2006".JAMA Internal Medicine, 2010
- Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular interventionNeurology, 2005
- Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: Training and credentialing for carotid stenting—multispecialty consensus recommendations: A report of the SCAI/SVMB/SVS Writing Committee to develop a clinical competence statement on carotid interventionsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Approval of Virtual Reality Training for Carotid StentingJAMA, 2004
- Protected Carotid-Artery Stenting versus Endarterectomy in High-Risk PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Early Outcome of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting With and Without Cerebral Protection DevicesStroke, 2003
- Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologiesHealth Technology Assessment, 2001
- ASSESSMENT OF THE LEARNING CURVE IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES A Systematic ReviewInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2000
- Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placementCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2000
- Predictors of Laparoscopic Complications After Formal Training in Laparoscopic SurgeryJAMA, 1993