No nouns, no verbs: psycholinguistic arguments in favor of lexical underspecification
- 31 October 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Lingua
- Vol. 112 (10), 771-791
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(02)00050-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- From Lot's Wife to a Pillar of Salt: Evidence thatPhysical Objectis a Sortal ConceptMind & Language, 1997
- Possible Individuals in Language and CognitionCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 1996
- What sort of innate structure is needed to “bootstrap” into syntax?Cognition, 1992
- Numerical abstraction by human infantsCognition, 1990
- Are actions to verbs as objects are to nouns? On the differential semantic bases of form, class, categoryLinguistics, 1990
- Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pure anomia: Implications for models of language productionCognitive Neuropsychology, 1988
- Count/mass category acquisition: distributional distinctions in children's speechJournal of Child Language, 1988
- ‘He has too much hard questions’: the acquisition of the linguistic mass–count distinction in much and manyJournal of Child Language, 1985
- On the Basis for the Agrammatic's Difficulty in Producing Main VerbsCortex, 1984
- Why do children fail to overgeneralize the progressive inflection?Journal of Child Language, 1978